Frontend-only workbench
LMD Decision Workbench
Turn a vague LMD/DED request into LMD Decision Brief v1.0: known facts, missing information, risk flags, evidence needed, and a next action.
Every standard brief can travel as a technical brief, an Exafuse-ready email draft, an AI summary, Markdown, JSON, grouped checklists, and print/PDF.
Outputs are preliminary decision-support only. Final feasibility depends on material, geometry, service conditions, inspection requirements, and expert review.
This browser tool does not send, store, or analyze your inputs outside this page.
Workbench status
Browser-local decision support.
The page behaves like a local engineering console: select inputs on the left, review the standard brief on the right, route serious cases to expert review.
Runtime
Frontend-only
Data sent
None by this site
Output type
Preliminary decision-support
Final route
Expert review / Exafuse RFQ
Start with a rough LMD question. Leave with a brief.
Pick the situation, mark what is known, then expose missing information, risk flags, evidence needed, and an Exafuse review route. Inputs stay in this browser session only.
- ;
- ;
Example scenario: worn steel shaft near bearing seat.
Review the worked output, start your own brief here, or open the full workbench.
Repair damaged/worn part: start with LMD Repairability Quick Check. Not enough information. Missing information and risk flags remain visible in the brief.
Tool 1
Process route module
LMD vs SLM Advisor: Compare early process-selection signals for Laser Metal Deposition and SLM/LPBF.
Interactive module Open LMD vs SLM Advisor Open controls
Sample output
A preliminary process direction, why, missing RFQ fields, risk flags, evidence needed, readiness, and next action.
Sample outputs are keyword/rule-based and intentionally conservative. Missing information and risk flags stay visible because they often change the decision.
Your live output
Change the inputs below. The output updates immediately so you can compare route signals, missing information, and risk flags.
What changes the decision
Input pane
Route-selection signals
Answer only what is known. This rule-based screen does not assume a part size, repair case, or local-deposition need.
Tool 2
Repairability module
LMD Repairability Quick Check: Screen whether an industrial part has enough preliminary signals to be reviewed as an LMD repair candidate.
Interactive module Open LMD Repairability Quick Check Open controls
Sample output
A repairability signal, known support, missing information, risk flags, evidence needed, readiness, and next action.
Sample outputs are keyword/rule-based and intentionally conservative. Missing information and risk flags stay visible because they often change the decision.
Your live output
Change the inputs below. The output updates immediately so you can compare route signals, missing information, and risk flags.
What changes the decision
Input pane
Repairability rule groups
Technical suitability, qualification burden, and commercial context are kept separate so business pressure cannot raise a technical screening result.
Tool 3
RFQ structure module
RFQ Prompt-to-Structure Converter: Turn free text into known facts, missing fields, risk flags, and a copyable RFQ summary.
Interactive module Open RFQ Prompt-to-Structure Converter Open controls
Sample output
A structured RFQ preview with part/material/damage hints, missing fields, risk flags, evidence needed, readiness, and copy buttons.
Sample outputs are keyword/rule-based and intentionally conservative. Missing information and risk flags stay visible because they often change the decision.
Your live output
Change the inputs below. The output updates immediately so you can compare route signals, missing information, and risk flags.
What changes the decision
Input pane
Free-text RFQ intake
Paste a rough request. The parser extracts visible hints and keeps missing RFQ fields explicit.
Brief quality rubric
What makes a brief useful?
This rubric checks brief quality, not technical feasibility.
- Exact material grade visible
- Geometry/drawing available
- Damage/build area described
- Service conditions stated
- Tolerance/finishing need stated
- Inspection requirement stated
- Risk flags not hidden
- Next action clear
Operating loop
Inputs -> gaps -> risks -> next action
The workbench keeps the loop short: structure the question, expose uncertainty, then route serious cases to expert review.
Illustrative workflow. Read left to right; Verify is the evidence boundary.
- 01
Sense
Collect signals, process data, context, operator observations, and missing-information cues.
- 02
Model
Combine machine learning, engineering rules, uncertainty, constraints, and traceable assumptions.
- 03
Decide
Structure recommendations, trade-offs, risk priorities, next actions, and human-review boundaries.
- 04
Verify
Connect decisions to inspection, measured outcomes, feedback loops, and physical evidence.
From personal decision support
Manish Sharma Lab structures the question.
The workbench helps separate known facts, missing information, risk flags, and a bounded next action. It is public, frontend-only, and intentionally conservative.
To Exafuse review
Exafuse performs commercial and technical review.
Final feasibility depends on material, geometry, service conditions, inspection requirements, and expert review. Use Exafuse for RFQs, services, company claims, and technical/commercial decisions.
Agent workflow