Case proof
Four public stories that make the expertise tangible
The strongest proof is not just a number. It is the chain from damaged or designed part, through route selection, deposition, finishing, monitoring, inspection, and release planning.
CS15
Duisburg Bridge Components
Public Exafuse proof context
Open 750 kg+ components 6 structural nodes 219 h single-node build approx. 38 km robot path 1M+ melt-pool images KIT validation context
Source link pending until Exafuse production migration
Large structural LMD is a CAD-to-production system problem: manufacturability review, path planning, parameter development, monitoring, independent validation, and final inspection.
This is the strongest public anchor for AI-assisted process understanding without replacing inspection evidence.
Decision pattern extracted
Large-scale LMD requires evidence planning, monitoring context, and an inspection boundary.
This is a pattern, not a transfer of feasibility.
monitoring relevancedecision-system relevanceevidence-ladder relevance
Start a brief from this pattern CS01
Forging Hammer Repair
Public Exafuse proof context
Open local wear repair
Source link pending until Exafuse production migration
A credible hammer repair is not one hardness number. It requires surface preparation, crack context, layer strategy, finishing, bond quality, and release evidence.
This maps directly to the LMD Repairability Index and the Quality Evidence Ladder.
Decision pattern extracted
Local repair needs material, damage depth, machining route, and inspection plan.
This is a pattern, not a transfer of feasibility.
repairability relevanceevidence-ladder relevance
Start a brief from this pattern CS10
Nobufil Extrusion Screw Repair
Public Exafuse proof context
Open local crack context
Source link pending until Exafuse production migration
Repair value often comes from a local failure with a large downtime risk. The damaged material must be removed before rebuilding, not hidden below new deposition.
This is a clean RFQ-intelligence example: damage boundary, lead time, machining route, and inspection context decide the recommendation.
Decision pattern extracted
Repair/RFQ quality depends on complete facts, downtime context, and service context.
This is a pattern, not a transfer of feasibility.
decision-system relevancerepairability relevance
Start a brief from this pattern CS13
130 mm Build-and-Coat Drill
Public Exafuse proof context
Open 130 mm build-and-coat drill
Source link pending until Exafuse production migration
LMD can combine geometry creation and functional surface strategy when material compatibility, coating duty, finishing, and validation are planned together.
This supports build-and-coat logic: geometry and surface function should be evaluated as one workflow.
Decision pattern extracted
Build-and-coat routes need geometry, surface function, material, finishing, and validation.
This is a pattern, not a transfer of feasibility.
decision-system relevanceevidence-ladder relevance
Start a brief from this pattern