Why this page exists
The existing 500-record map is broad metadata. This page is a smaller, curated starting map for people who need to understand which source areas matter before reading deeper.
Curated research map
A curated starting map for engineers, students, and AI agents. It complements the broad 500-record reference map; it does not pretend to be a complete systematic review.
The existing 500-record map is broad metadata. This page is a smaller, curated starting map for people who need to understand which source areas matter before reading deeper.
Use it to choose what to read next, not as a final literature review. Working-draft rows should be replaced only when a real source URL is confirmed.
The next improvement is to replace working-draft source categories with verified standards pages, review papers, and stable public source URLs without inventing paper details or DOIs.
DED-LB/M terminology, LMD process monitoring review, in-situ monitoring metal additive manufacturing review, machine learning metal additive manufacturing review, laser cladding repair inspection, LMD quality evidence.
Categories
Start with terminology and process-family boundaries before comparing LMD, DED, DED-LB/M, laser cladding, SLM, or LPBF.
Use these sources to understand what signals can indicate, what they cannot prove, and how signals connect to inspection evidence.
Use these sources to evaluate data foundations, labels, validation, model limits, and decision-support boundaries.
Use these sources to connect porosity, lack of fusion, cracking, dilution, distortion, and property mismatch to physical evidence.
Use these sources to understand when local deposition, surface restoration, coating, machining, and inspection planning matter.
Use these sources to keep quality claims tied to NDT, dimensional inspection, metallography, hardness, mechanical testing, and service risk.
Use these sources when exact definitions matter. This page should not be treated as standard wording.
Source map
Rows marked as working draft are source categories to verify, not citations.
Terminology category
Keeps LMD, DED, DED-LB/M, cladding, SLM, and LPBF from being mixed together.
Working draft - standards source URL not yet verified
Public technical-resource category
Gives a reliable starting point for process-family boundaries and additive manufacturing vocabulary.
Working draft - public source URL not yet verified
Review-paper category
Useful for understanding what in-situ monitoring can observe and why monitoring is not final release evidence.
Working draft - review source to verify
Review-paper category
Useful for linking melt-pool signals, thermal history, geometry, and inspection outcomes in DED/LMD.
Working draft - review source to verify
Review-paper category
Useful for model categories, data limits, labels, validation boundaries, and decision-support claims.
Working draft - review source to verify
Review / handbook category
Useful for connecting porosity, lack of fusion, cracking, dilution, distortion, and property mismatch to inspection evidence.
Working draft - source to verify
Public industrial case studies
Shows repair, cladding, build-and-coat, and large-part LMD situations without confidential project data.
Public Exafuse source map below
Standards / inspection category
Keeps quality claims tied to inspection, testing, acceptance criteria, and service risk.
Working draft - source to verify
Method and governance category
Keeps AI claims bounded by uncertainty, escalation, human review, and verification evidence.
Working draft - source to verify
Process-selection category
Helps compare LMD/DED, cladding, SLM/LPBF, machining, replacement, and hybrid routes.
Working draft - source to verify
Verification queue
These items are intentionally not cited as papers or standards yet. Add URLs only after the exact source is confirmed.
Existing source anchors
These links are already present in the evidence layer and public Exafuse proof map.
Disclaimer
This page is a curated starting map, not a complete literature review or formal standard. Exact technical claims should be checked against the original source, standard, inspection requirement, and engineering context.
Established domain