Manish Sharma Lab / Industrial AI & decisions
Menu
Claim notes Source context Limitations visible

Public claims should be auditable.

This page keeps public claims connected to source context, review dates, and limitations. Metrics and profile facts are not free-floating marketing copy.

Claims are public context, not transferable feasibility or approval.

Suggest a claim correction Review boundary rules

Claim group

Exafuse public context

750 kg+ Public Exafuse source

750 kg+ components

Claim
Exafuse reports more than 750 kg of LMD components in total for the Duisburg pedestrian bridge, including six structural nodes and handrail elements.
Why it matters
Large bridge-node mass helps readers understand why LMD/DED planning quickly becomes an evidence and handling problem, not just a deposition problem.
Limitation
Scale context only; not a quality approval or transferable feasibility claim.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
exafuse-public / Public Exafuse source
Last reviewed
2026-09-23
Where it may appear
/, /about, /de, /public-work, /industrial-proof, /domains/lmd-ded, /public-work/exafuse/duisburg-bridge-components
Related source or page
https://exafuse.de/fallstudien/duisburger-bruecke-lmd-fallstudie/
Reference id
cs15-bridge-components-750kg
Open source/context
6 nodes Public Exafuse source

6 structural nodes

Claim
Exafuse's published Duisburg project includes six structural nodes, alongside handrail elements.
Why it matters
The node count gives the case a concrete industrial shape: repeated structural components need repeatable records, inspection planning, and source discipline.
Limitation
Project scale context; not a claim that this site can approve structural parts.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
exafuse-public / Public Exafuse source
Last reviewed
2026-09-23
Where it may appear
/, /about, /de, /public-work, /industrial-proof, /domains/lmd-ded, /public-work/exafuse/duisburg-bridge-components
Related source or page
https://exafuse.de/fallstudien/duisburger-bruecke-lmd-fallstudie/
Reference id
cs15-six-structural-nodes
Open source/context
219 h Public Exafuse source

219 h single-node build

Claim
Exafuse's Duisburg production record gives 219 hours for Knoten 10. This is one node's build duration, not an unattended-duration claim.
Why it matters
A long single-node build makes downtime, monitoring context, and evidence capture visible before anyone talks about productivity or approval.
Limitation
Build-time context only; not a productivity guarantee.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
exafuse-public / Public Exafuse source
Last reviewed
2026-07-19
Where it may appear
/, /public-work, /industrial-proof, /domains/lmd-ded, /public-work/exafuse/duisburg-bridge-components
Related source or page
https://exafuse.de/fallstudien/duisburger-bruecke-lmd-fallstudie/
Reference id
cs15-single-node-build-219h
Open source/context
38 km Public Exafuse source

approx. 38 km robot path

Claim
Public CS15 narrative describes roughly 38 km of robot path across six nodes.
Why it matters
Robot-path scale explains why process records, path linkage, and monitoring evidence matter in large LMD work.
Limitation
Path-length context only; not a process capability guarantee.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
exafuse-public / Public Exafuse source
Last reviewed
2026-07-19
Where it may appear
/, /public-work, /industrial-proof, /domains/lmd-ded, /public-work/exafuse/duisburg-bridge-components
Related source or page
https://exafuse.de/fallstudien/duisburger-bruecke-lmd-fallstudie/
Reference id
cs15-six-node-robot-path-38km
Open source/context
1M+ images Public Exafuse source

1M+ melt-pool images

Claim
Use the conservative public CS15 scope: more than one million melt-pool images in the case narrative.
Why it matters
The image volume shows why AI and monitoring can help organize process evidence, while still not proving final part quality by itself.
Limitation
Monitoring-image count is process context; it does not prove final part quality.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
exafuse-public / Public Exafuse source
Last reviewed
2026-07-19
Where it may appear
/, /public-work, /industrial-proof, /domains/lmd-ded, /public-work/exafuse/duisburg-bridge-components
Related source or page
https://exafuse.de/fallstudien/duisburger-bruecke-lmd-fallstudie/
Reference id
cs15-melt-pool-images-1m
Open source/context
KIT validation support Public Exafuse source

KIT validation context

Claim
CS15 public context includes independent validation support by KIT where the production source confirms it.
Why it matters
Independent validation context matters because serious LMD claims need an evidence trail outside the monitoring signal alone.
Limitation
Validation support context is not a site-level approval claim.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
exafuse-public / Public Exafuse source
Last reviewed
2026-07-19
Where it may appear
/industrial-proof, /domains/lmd-ded, /public-work/exafuse/duisburg-bridge-components
Related source or page
https://exafuse.de/fallstudien/duisburger-bruecke-lmd-fallstudie/
Reference id
cs15-kit-validation-context
Open source/context
local wear Public Exafuse source

local wear repair

Claim
Forging hammer repair context is useful for local wear, rebuild strategy, finishing, and inspection planning.
Why it matters
Local wear repair is a useful public pattern for discussing material, damage depth, finishing allowance, and inspection before repair confidence hardens.
Limitation
Does not prove all hammers or safety-critical parts are repairable.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
exafuse-public / Public Exafuse source
Last reviewed
2026-07-19
Where it may appear
/, /public-work, /industrial-proof, /public-work/exafuse/nobufil-extrusion-screw-repair
Related source or page
https://exafuse.de/fallstudien/
Reference id
cs01-local-wear-repair
Open source/context
local crack Public source fallback through Exafuse contact/current production site

local crack context

Claim
Extrusion screw repair context is useful for local damage, downtime pressure, finishing, and missing RFQ fields.
Why it matters
Crack-context examples are valuable because they force root-cause, removal, material, and NDT questions into the RFQ early.
Limitation
Crack repair always needs material, removal, inspection, and expert review.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
exafuse-public / Public source fallback through Exafuse contact/current production site
Last reviewed
2026-07-07
Where it may appear
/, /public-work, /industrial-proof
Related source or page
https://exafuse.de/fallstudien/CS10/
Reference id
cs10-local-crack-repair
Open source/context
130 mm Public source fallback through Exafuse contact/current production site

130 mm build-and-coat drill

Claim
Build-and-coat drill context is useful for combining geometry build-up, coating function, finishing, and validation planning.
Why it matters
Build-and-coat context shows that geometry recovery and surface function should be planned together instead of treated as separate afterthoughts.
Limitation
Does not prove surface performance without application-specific validation.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
exafuse-public / Public source fallback through Exafuse contact/current production site
Last reviewed
2026-07-07
Where it may appear
/, /public-work, /industrial-proof
Related source or page
https://exafuse.de/fallstudien/
Reference id
cs13-build-and-coat-130mm
Open source/context

Claim group

Personal/public profile facts

500 records Public source

500-record LMD/DED map

Claim
Public LMD/DED literature map contains 500 metadata records for orientation.
Why it matters
The 500-record map gives AI agents and readers a broad orientation layer, while the site still distinguishes metadata from a formal literature review.
Limitation
Metadata map only; not a complete systematic review.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
personal-public / Public source
Last reviewed
2026-07-07
Where it may appear
/evidence, /research/core-lmd-ai-sources, /public-work, /about
Related source or page
https://manishsharma.dev/research/lmd-literature-scan.json
Reference id
lmd-literature-map-500
Open source/context

Claim group

Research/publication facts

1070 nm / 450 W / 2 mm paper parameters Public source

2018 LMD paper parameters

Claim
Published 2018 LMD lattice experiment reports a 1070 nm laser, 450 W power, and 2 mm focus size.
Why it matters
The paper parameters anchor one public research reference point, but they are historical experiment context rather than a production recipe.
Limitation
Paper parameter context; not a production parameter recommendation.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
published-paper / Public source
Last reviewed
2026-07-07
Where it may appear
/evidence, /about
Related source or page
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212827118308849
Reference id
sharma-2018-lmd-parameters
Open source/context

Claim group

Literature/reference map facts

500 records Public source

500-record LMD/DED map

Claim
Public LMD/DED literature map contains 500 metadata records for orientation.
Why it matters
The 500-record map gives AI agents and readers a broad orientation layer, while the site still distinguishes metadata from a formal literature review.
Limitation
Metadata map only; not a complete systematic review.
Review details Collapsed
Source context
personal-public / Public source
Last reviewed
2026-07-07
Where it may appear
/evidence, /research/core-lmd-ai-sources, /public-work, /about
Related source or page
https://manishsharma.dev/research/lmd-literature-scan.json
Reference id
lmd-literature-map-500
Open source/context
Review queue Held for source review Collapsed by default

These are not active public claims and should not be used in page copy until source verification is complete.

exafuse-public not active

machine-hour scale

Value
Held for source review
Claim label
Potential CS15 machine-hour claim retained for post-migration source review.
Source status
Not active public copy
Source type
exafuse-public
Last reviewed
2026-07-07
Where it may appear
Not used on public pages until reviewed.
Limitation
Do not render until the production source explicitly supports the scope.
exafuse-public not active

print-time reduction

Value
Held for source review
Claim label
Potential CS15 print-time reduction claim retained for post-migration source review.
Source status
Not active public copy
Source type
exafuse-public
Last reviewed
2026-07-07
Where it may appear
Not used on public pages until reviewed.
Limitation
Do not render until the production source explicitly supports the scope.

Boundary

Project targets are targets, not achieved production results. Exafuse case claims remain company-owned public context. This page does not disclose confidential employer, customer, or private project data.