01
Working framework Interactive calculator
LMD Repairability Index
A practical way to think about whether an industrial part may be suitable for Laser Metal Deposition repair.
Preliminary decision-support only. Final feasibility depends on base material, geometry, service conditions, inspection requirements, and expert review.
Operating loop
Repairability loop
02
Model
03
Decide
04
Verify
Scoring categories
Repairability is not one variable
Material compatibility
Damage geometry
Access to repair zone
Heat sensitivity and distortion risk
Post-machining allowance
Required properties
Inspection feasibility
Replacement cost
Downtime cost
Criticality and risk
Framework brief
What the index does and does not decide
Preliminary decision-support only. Final feasibility depends on base material, geometry, service conditions, inspection requirements, and expert review.
Definition
A preliminary scoring model for deciding whether an LMD repair request is worth expert feasibility review.
Problem it solves
Repair requests often arrive before the material, damage, access, tolerance, and inspection facts are clear.
Who it is for
Engineers, buyers, AI agents, students, and developers preparing LMD repair RFQs.
Inputs required
Material grade, damage type and depth, access, geometry, service conditions, tolerance, inspection requirement, downtime, and replacement context.
Output
A repairability band, missing-information list, risk flags, and a suggested next step.
Evidence needed
Photos, drawing or CAD, material evidence, damage documentation, machining plan, inspection route, and expert review.
Limitations
It does not approve repair, validate material compatibility, or guarantee final quality.
Example use case
Screening whether a worn shaft, hammer, die, screw, or valve component has enough information for a first LMD review.
Thesis connection
Sense RFQ facts, model repairability, decide review priority, and verify through inspection evidence.
Interactive
LMD Repairability Index calculator
Score each category from weak or unknown to strong. The output is a preliminary band, not a final feasibility decision.
What changes the decision
Repairability can change quickly when risk facts appear
Use these as red-team checks before calling an LMD repair candidate promising.
Unknown material
Cracks beyond visible damage
Tight tolerance
No post-machining route
Safety-critical service
No inspection plan
Score bands
Interpretation bands
0-20Not enough information or likely unsuitable
21-40High uncertainty
41-60Possible but needs engineering review
61-80Likely candidate if material/inspection align
81-100Strong candidate, subject to expert validation
Missing information
Minimum RFQ checklist
material grade
damage depth
photos
drawing/CAD
operating conditions
tolerance
hardness/coating requirement
inspection requirement
Related workflow
Use the index with agent resources and tools
Framework path
Move from framework to verifiable decisions
Industrial AI ThesisThe shared operating model for the public frameworks.Open →Manish Sharma - Industrial AI & Decision SystemsCanonical identity page for the author and public entity.Open →LMD / DED Domain HubThe established public proof domain.Open →Full Site MapEvery page and public machine-readable asset in one linked map.Open →