{
  "briefVersion": "LMD Decision Brief v1.0",
  "artifactType": "LMD Decision Brief",
  "status": "Preliminary decision support",
  "notValidFor": [
    "approval",
    "certification",
    "release",
    "safety-critical acceptance",
    "quality guarantee"
  ],
  "outputMode": "JSON handoff",
  "boundaryStatement": "Confidence is not approval. Preliminary decision-support only. Final feasibility depends on base material, geometry, service conditions, inspection requirements, and expert review.",
  "noBackendNote": "No backend. No data sent by this site.",
  "noAutomaticSendingNote": "No automatic sending. Nothing is sent unless you send it from your own email client.",
  "brief": {
    "briefVersion": "LMD Decision Brief v1.0",
    "artifactType": "LMD Decision Brief",
    "status": "Preliminary decision support",
    "preparedFor": "Expert review / RFQ discussion",
    "notValidFor": [
      "approval",
      "certification",
      "release",
      "safety-critical acceptance",
      "quality guarantee"
    ],
    "outputMode": "JSON handoff",
    "situation": "Public-safe dummy example: rough LMD repair RFQ.",
    "component": "Industrial component not yet fully identified",
    "goal": "Turn a vague RFQ into known facts, gaps, risk flags, evidence needs, and review route.",
    "material": "Material grade missing.",
    "geometryOrSize": "Geometry not yet provided.",
    "damageOrBuildArea": "Damage area mentioned but depth not defined.",
    "availableData": [
      "Photos may be available"
    ],
    "knownFacts": [
      "Repair intent",
      "Local damage implied",
      "Downtime pressure possible"
    ],
    "missingInformation": [
      "Exact material grade",
      "Damage depth",
      "Photos",
      "Drawing/CAD",
      "Dimensions",
      "Tolerance",
      "Operating conditions",
      "Inspection requirement",
      "Deadline"
    ],
    "missingCritical": [
      "Exact material grade",
      "Damage depth",
      "Drawing/CAD",
      "Dimensions",
      "Operating conditions",
      "Inspection requirement"
    ],
    "missingUseful": [
      "Photos",
      "Tolerance",
      "Deadline"
    ],
    "missingOptional": [
      "Prior repair history",
      "Budget estimate",
      "Reference part"
    ],
    "riskFlags": [
      "Unknown material blocks firm repair recommendations.",
      "Missing geometry and damage depth can change the route.",
      "Downtime pressure should not remove inspection requirements."
    ],
    "evidenceNeeded": [
      "Material grade",
      "Drawing/CAD or dimensional sketch",
      "Damage depth and photos",
      "Tolerance target",
      "Inspection requirement",
      "Expert review"
    ],
    "preliminaryRoute": "Use the RFQ Prompt-to-Structure Converter before asking for feasibility.",
    "reviewReadiness": "Not enough information",
    "briefCompleteness": "Ready for preliminary discussion",
    "expertReviewPackageStatus": "Not ready",
    "completenessNote": "Completeness describes whether the brief can support a useful conversation. It is not feasibility, approval, or release evidence.",
    "evidenceBurden": "High inspection burden",
    "evidenceBurdenNote": "Evidence burden is a planning label, not release approval.",
    "nextAction": "Ask for missing fields and prepare a compact Exafuse-ready review summary.",
    "exafuseReviewRoute": "Use Exafuse for commercial and technical review after the RFQ facts and gaps are structured.",
    "boundaryStatement": "Confidence is not approval. Preliminary decision-support only. Final feasibility depends on base material, geometry, service conditions, inspection requirements, and expert review.",
    "generatedFrom": "LMD Decision Cockpit public-safe RFQ preset",
    "noBackendNote": "No backend. No data sent by this site.",
    "noAutomaticSendingNote": "No automatic sending. Nothing is sent unless you send it from your own email client."
  }
}